![]() This results in a hollow sound, similar to when you use a static EQ cut. This is where you're ducking the resonance further than is needed to fix the problem. The third big error that can ruin your master is over processing. Once you start going above 8, you’re cutting so much from the frequency spectrum that you’ll be affecting the overall character of the sound. It’s common to see around 4 to 8 resonances in a mix that would benefit from being reduced. As a mastering engineer myself, I'm working on a handful of tracks every day. It sounds unnatural and possibly worse than the resonance itself.Īnother common pitfall is trying to fix more resonances than is necessary. With a static cut, the cut is always present, which is like taking a slice out of your sound. When you use dynamic processing, the attenuation occurs relative to how loud the resonance is. How Can Resonance Removal Mess Up My Master?ĭynamically taming resonances is a better and more transparent approach than using a static EQ cut with a high Q. In this blog I’ll show you how to fix resonant issues during mastering without messing up your mix. But you don’t want to leave in resonant problems… ![]() If you overdo it the mix will start sounding like there’s a weird filter making it thin. Resonance removal can be a pretty destructive process. Now you ask yourself… Can I remove these resonances during mastering, or will that mess up my sound? Resonances infect your mix with their unpleasant and fatiguing tone.Įven if you effectively tame all the problematic resonances on individual channels during mixing, you might find that when the channels combine together, more resonances appear.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |